"Landowners burnt by land tax fiddle"
Mark Skelsey and Kelvin Bissett, NSW Daily Telegraph, 26
February 2005
PROPERTY owners have been hit with inflated land tax bills because
rises in government valuations last year were more than twice actual
market results.
In some council areas, median residential sale prices fell by 10
per cent, but the NSW Valuer-General decided values used for land
tax calculations should be increased by 10 per cent.
The revelations have led to calls for a complete overhaul of the
state's official valuation system, which is already under review
by the NSW Ombudsman.
Using FoI laws, The Daily Telegraph has obtained the average residential
valuation applied by the NSW Valuer-General for every council area
at July 1, 2004.
The figures show the NSW Valuer-General decreed average residential
values rose by 17.4 per cent across NSW and 14.9 per cent in Sydney
over the year.
Some areas had extraordinary rises - Cessnock and Lismore rose
77 per cent.
The figures clash violently with actual residential sales during
the same period.
The NSW Housing Department's sales report, the most comprehensive
available, shows median sales actually rose by only 6.8 per cent
and Sydney sales by only 2.4 per cent during the same period.
In other words, the increase applied to properties by the NSW Valuer-General
was 2½ times the market trend.
The rising valuations are used to calculate land tax bills, which
have been sent out this month and caused a storm of protest.
Premier Bob Carr conceded this week he may make changes to the
land tax system, which has seen up to 300,000 people paying the
tax for the first time.
NSW Valuer-General Philip Western yesterday said he wasn't concerned
his figures were out of step with the market.
He said his increases were based on vacant land sales, combined
with an analysis of local market trends, which are used to extrapolate
a valuation for every NSW property.
NSW land valuations exclude the value of any "improvements"
to the land - such as a house.
"Our figures reflect the current real estate market for vacant
land, while the Housing Department data is based on improved properties,"
he said.
"There can be a wide difference between the two markets."
He also said the statistical basis of the NSW Housing Department
and his report were slightly different, but admitted this did not
explain the disparity.
Century 21 South-East real estate agency principal Richard Movsessian
said he'd spoken to about 30 people unhappy with their valuations.
In the Botany Bay council area, government valuations have risen
12.1 per cent when the market fell by 8.5 per cent.
"Around here there's only been one vacant land sale during
that time," he said.
Land tax lawyer David Singer said the figures showed that the NSW
Valuer-General's figures were flawed.
"We can't get any paperwork out of the office to show how
he's come up with these increases," he said.
"Why have valuations increased when there's no evidence [land
values] have?"
. |