"Cuckoo among super nest eggs"
Editorial, NSW Daily Telegraph, 15 February 2005
WORRIED by the galloping excesses which easy credit and a vast
array of consumer choice appear to have engendered, successive governments
have tried increasingly to restore the concept of thrift as a virtue.
And property investment as a means of forced savings, and preparing
for self-funded retirement, has been given the big tick. So hundreds
of thousands of Australians, using the benefits of negative gearing
and claiming the interest on their property investment loans as
tax deductions, have become small-time landlords.
In NSW many of them now might well be questioning the wisdom of
their investment strategy. For the Carr Government's land tax grab
has made the equation a whole less attractive. Last year, then-treasurer
Michael Egan ruled that all investment properties -- regardless
of value -- would attract land tax, thereby abolishing the former
$317,000 threshold.
Following our report yesterday on this issue, the offices of The
Daily Telegraph were swamped with stories from people who had been
caught in this insidious trap.
The experience of Bexley resident, 72-year-old Ron Grasso is typical.
By dint of frugality, Ron accumulated enough during his working
life to buy a small rental property which he lets out for $220 a
week -- money he lives on in retirement. But now he's been hit with
a land tax bill of $457. He puts the picture tersely.
"I'm saving the government a fortune [by not having to pay
me a retirement pension] and this how they pay me back," he
said.
One possible outcome is that people such as Ron Grasso will sell
up, spend the proceeds, then ask for the pension to which they are
entitled. Another is that the next generation of potential property
investors will simply abandon the field -- a lose/lose proposition.
The talk is that Mr Carr is thinking carefully about how to untangle
this mess.
Abolishing land tax -- or at least, reimposing a realistic threshold
-- should be up for discussion.
. |